SAR Library Catalog

Government of paper : the materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan / Matthew S. Hull.

By: Hull, Matthew S. (Matthew Stuart), 1968-Material type: TextTextPublisher: Berkeley : University of California Press, c2012Description: xiv, 301 p. : ill., map ; 24 cmISBN: 9780520272149 (cloth : alk. paper); 9780520272156 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subject(s): Government paperwork -- Pakistan -- Islāmābād | Bureaucracy -- Pakistan -- Islāmābād | Capitals (Cities) -- Pakistan -- Planning | City planning -- Pakistan -- Islāmābād | Public records -- Pakistan -- Islāmābād | Municipal government -- Pakistan -- Records and correspondence | Islāmābād (Pakistan) -- Politics and governmentDDC classification: 352.3/8709549149 LOC classification: JS7093.A6 | R425 2012
Contents:
Introduction -- The master plan and other documents -- Parchis, petitions and offices: approaches to the bureaucracy -- Files and the political economy of paper -- The expropriation of land and the misappropriation of lists -- Maps, mosques, and maslaks: ecumenical planning and sectarian conflict.
Summary: In the electronic age, documents appear to have escaped their paper confinement. But we are still surrounded by flows of paper with enormous consequences. In the planned city of Islamabad, order and disorder are produced through the ceaseless inscription and circulation of millions of paper artifacts among bureaucrats, politicians, property owners, villagers, imams (prayer leaders), businessmen, and builders. What are the implications of such a thorough paper mediation of relationships among people, things, places, and purposes? Government of Paper explores this question in the routine yet unpredictable realm of the Pakistani urban bureaucracy, showing how the material forms of postcolonial bureaucratic documentation produce a distinctive political economy of paper that shapes how the city is constructed, regulated, and inhabited. Files, maps, petitions, and visiting cards constitute the enduring material infrastructure of more ephemeral classifications, laws, and institutional organizations. Matthew S. Hull develops a fresh approach to state governance as a material practice, explaining why writing practices designed during the colonial era to isolate the government from society have become a means of participation in it. Summary: J.I. Staley Prize, 2019
List(s) this item appears in: Staley Prize - Best in Anthropology
Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Main library collection
Staley Prize shelf
REF 352.3 Hull 2012 Not For Loan t 18952
Main library collection
Stacks
352.3 Hul 2012 Available t 18300
Total holds: 0

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction -- The master plan and other documents -- Parchis, petitions and offices: approaches to the bureaucracy -- Files and the political economy of paper -- The expropriation of land and the misappropriation of lists -- Maps, mosques, and maslaks: ecumenical planning and sectarian conflict.

In the electronic age, documents appear to have escaped their paper confinement. But we are still surrounded by flows of paper with enormous consequences. In the planned city of Islamabad, order and disorder are produced through the ceaseless inscription and circulation of millions of paper artifacts among bureaucrats, politicians, property owners, villagers, imams (prayer leaders), businessmen, and builders. What are the implications of such a thorough paper mediation of relationships among people, things, places, and purposes? Government of Paper explores this question in the routine yet unpredictable realm of the Pakistani urban bureaucracy, showing how the material forms of postcolonial bureaucratic documentation produce a distinctive political economy of paper that shapes how the city is constructed, regulated, and inhabited. Files, maps, petitions, and visiting cards constitute the enduring material infrastructure of more ephemeral classifications, laws, and institutional organizations. Matthew S. Hull develops a fresh approach to state governance as a material practice, explaining why writing practices designed during the colonial era to isolate the government from society have become a means of participation in it.

J.I. Staley Prize, 2019

Powered by Koha